Editorial policy

The site should be useful, specific, and easy to audit

Editorial decisions are meant to support a running-performance product, not a content farm. That means tighter scope, more transparent updates, and a preference for clear interpretation over inflated volume.

Editorial standards

  • Guides should be written for runners first and search engines second.
  • Claims about physiology, prediction, or training should be attached to a named method or cited source when the page relies on them.
  • Corrections should update the page content and the visible updated date.
  • Site-wide trust language should avoid invented authority, fake usage metrics, or generic expertise claims.

Update policy

Pages should be updated when formulas, assumptions, tool behavior, or references materially change. Freshness should reflect real revision work, not arbitrary date resets.

Correction policy

If a reader identifies an error, the page should be corrected, the visible update date should change, and the revised content should match the fix instead of silently drifting.